Prof. Giacomo Novara — Urology, University of Padova
UPJ Obstruction — Congenital hydronephrosis from junction obstruction
The ureteropelvic junction is the transition point between the renal pelvis and the proximal ureter. When this passage is obstructed, urine accumulates in the pelvis, generating increasing pressures that — over time — compress and atrophy the surrounding renal parenchyma. The rate of damage depends on the severity of the obstruction.
The most common cause, often congenital. A segment of the proximal ureter fails to contract normally (aperistalsis) or is anatomically narrowed (true stenosis). Urine is not propelled distally with adequate force.
An aberrant lower pole arterial branch crosses the UPJ externally, compressing it. The pelvis and ureter are intrinsically normal, but the vessel "strangulates" them from outside. Visible on contrast-enhanced CT in the arterial phase.
Both forms may coexist. In neonates, congenital aperistaltic segments predominate; in young adults, a crossing vessel is frequently identified and may explain late-onset symptoms.
UPJ obstruction may present at very different ages depending on severity:
Perinatal diagnosis on routine obstetric ultrasound. Detection of foetal hydronephrosis requires neonatal and urological follow-up. Often asymptomatic at birth.
Atypical renal colic or progressive flank pain. Non-contrast CT shows hydronephrosis but no calculi. This is the most characteristic presentation: the patient is investigated for suspected urolithiasis and a UPJ obstruction is found instead.
Urinary stasis within the dilated collecting system promotes stone formation. In this case both the calculus and the underlying anatomical defect must be treated — removing only the stone would leave a dilated cavity in which it would reform.
First-line screening: demonstrates dilatation of the pelvicalyceal system (hydronephrosis). Not definitive for the cause, but indicates an obstruction at the level of the renal outlet.
Rules out urolithiasis (unenhanced phase), evaluates perirenal vascular anatomy (arterial phase: crossing vessel?), and documents the degree of dilatation and residual parenchymal thickness. Essential for surgical planning.
An indispensable functional study: distinguishes the dilated-but-non-obstructed kidney from the dilated-and-obstructed kidney. Only functionally obstructed kidneys require surgical intervention.
MAG3 is a radiolabelled tracer filtered and secreted by the kidney. The uptake/excretion curve allows assessment of:
Practical interpretation: dilated kidney that drains normally after furosemide = dilatation without functional obstruction → surveillance. Dilated kidney that fails to drain after furosemide = functional obstruction → surgical indication. Kidney with no uptake = destroyed parenchyma → consider nephrectomy.
Flat drainage curve after furosemide. The kidney does not drain. Risk of progressive parenchymal damage. Surgical repair is indicated.
The kidney drains normally. The dilatation is anatomical but not functionally significant. Periodic ultrasound follow-up without intervention.
Robotic pyeloplasty is the gold standard. Open surgery is no longer acceptable: it requires a large incision. Laparoscopy is technically demanding because of the multiple sutures required. With the robot, anatomical structures are better visualised, suturing is more precise, and the probability of success is higher.
Principle: excision of the obstructed UPJ segment (stenotic or aperistaltic) and reconstruction of continuity between the renal pelvis and ureter. If a crossing vessel is present, it is transposed so that it no longer compresses the reconstructed junction.
Postoperative course: hospital stay 2 days. Discharged with an internal DJ stent in situ, which is removed cystoscopically as an outpatient procedure 4–6 weeks later. Renography at 3 months to confirm resolution of obstruction.
UPJ obstruction is not a static condition: chronic intrapelvic pressure causes progressive and irreversible atrophy of the renal parenchyma. The rate of damage is proportional to the severity of the obstruction.
A young patient with right hydronephrosis and documented functional obstruction on renography. Robotic pyeloplasty was recommended. For family reasons (living abroad) the patient did not undergo surgery.
Two years later, follow-up renography: the kidney that had previously shown reduced uptake was now entirely non-functioning. The renal parenchyma had been destroyed by prolonged obstruction.
Outcome: laparoscopic nephrectomy. A kidney that could have been saved with elective pyeloplasty was lost due to delay in surgical treatment.
The clinical message: when renography documents functional obstruction, treatment should not be postponed indefinitely.
⚠️ The information on this website is intended for educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice and does not establish a doctor-patient relationship. For any personal clinical matter, please consult your physician or book a specialist appointment. Full medical disclaimer →